CHN Community Log In/Register

February 25, 2008 E-MAIL PRINT Bookmark and Share

NCAA Tournament: Bracket ABCs

by Adam Wodon/Managing Editor

It's that time of year, the early look into the possibilities for the NCAA tournament, and an analysis of that strange animal known as the Pairwise with our ABCs (analysis, breakdown and comparison).

(For those new to this, check out the Pairwise primer to learn what it's all about and how it works. ... Also see a history of past Pairwise commentaries.)

As fun as this kind of poking around can be, it is always a dubious task. For one, telling everyone how the brackets would look if the season ended today, is a bit useless, since, of course, the season doesn't end today.

On the other hand, trying to project the bracket is futile. So many things can happen. What we've tried to do in the past was give a sense of where teams line up, and where they could go, and point out various degrees of certainties or uncertainties. But even that proves troublesome. Last year, with a month to go, we were already convinced St. Cloud State would be a No. 1 seed and Denver would be in the tournament. Neither of those happened.

Our stumbling block last year was in the difficulty of reading the RPI, particularly the so-called "TUC Cliff." This is where teams move in and out of "Team Under Consideration" status based upon their RPI. But RPI is hard to forsee because of all the factors. And since "Record vs. TUC" is a major component of the Pairwise, the makeup of which 25 teams are considered TUCs is very important to the final list.

Nonetheless, we have been able to spot trends and potential NCAA committee pitfalls. Two years ago, we pointed out the oncoming trouble with a potential two-team Atlantic Hockey contingent, and where losing games for one team would benefit the league. We've been able to spot potential dilemmas in travel situations. And last year, we correctly pointed out the tiebreaking procedure for two teams.

This year, our record is already dubious, and we haven't really started yet. Earlier this season, we predicted the impending drop of Michigan State in the Pairwise list. That had to do, again, with the "Record vs. TUC" component. Nowadays, that component is only recorded if each team being compared have played 10 games against TUCs. Michigan State was about to hit its 10th game, but its record was lousy against TUCs. It stood to reason that the Spartans would fall hard once that component kicked in. However, by getting three points out of Michigan that weekend, the Spartans' RPI went up enough to compensate for the problem, and MSU didn't move in the Pairwise at all. In fact, they are pretty much in the same place now.

This doesn't stop us from making the same "sky is falling" declarations again, however. In this very article, there is another dire warning of "TUC Rule" disaster. Princeton is about to get TUCed — hard. (Actually, it already did. For more, see below.)

With that introduction, the rest might be anti-climactic, but here goes — an analysis of each team in the mix, listed in order of the current Pairwise:

1. Michigan

If Michigan lost its next four games — none of which would be against Teams Under Consideration — it could still get a No. 1 seed. So the odds are that Michigan has that No. 1 seed locked up. This would put the Wolverines in the regional closest to home, which would be Madison, Wisconsin. That's still a 380-mile trip, and thus, a flight. But nothing else is remotely closer. The only way, it looks like, that Michigan would not wind up in Madison is if North Dakota passes them on the list and gets first dibs. But the distance from Grand Forks to Madison is about the same as Ann Arbor to the Albany regional. The point is, unless Minnesota State (293 miles from Madison according to Google) makes a charge into a No. 1 seed spot, it really doesn't matter. Michigan should be most concerned about getting Chad Kolarik back and healthy.

2. New Hampshire

Assuming New Hampshire holds a top seed, it will host the Worcester regional (95 miles from Durham, N.H.). It's going to be tough for New Hampshire to lose the edge it has on Colorado College and North Dakota, though it could easily lose with Miami. A UNH loss to Vermont in two weeks would tip the scales in Miami's favor, and cause a tie in the top. And if that happens, then UNH loses in RPI to CC and North Dakota, which is the tiebreaker.

3. Colorado College

The Tigers are hosting the West Regional in their home arena, so you know where they're going to be. That it will be as the No. 1 seed is looking increasingly likely. Depending on where things fall, Denver could line up in that bracket as well. The committee, judging by recent experience, would not put Denver in that bracket just because it wants to boost attendance. First of all, CC will take care of that enough. But second of all, the committee just doesn't worry about that anymore. So it would only happen if CC is No. 3 and Denver No. 6, or 2-7, or 4-5, etc... HOWEVER, if CC drops and Denver is a No. 1 seed, then most likely, Denver would be the No. 1 seed in the West Regional. And since CC HAS to be in the West Regional, those two would end up in the same bracket after all.

4. North Dakota

The only team North Dakota really has to worry about below it is Miami. If the Sioux play reasonably well, they will likely get a No. 1 seed. If they continue like gangbusters as they have been, there is no doubt, and they'll likely be in Albany. But if they play well and Miami plays better, and no other teams change, then Miami can flip-flop with the Sioux easily. Then North Dakota would be a No. 2 seed, probably against Miami in Albany anyway.

5. Miami

The RedHawks are in a weird spot right because they are a good team which has yet to reach the TUC status. So their strong 6-2-1 Record vs. TUC is currently not counting. And it may not. They play Ohio State in their final two regular-season games, then will have a bye, then a second-round opponent in the CCHA tournament that probably won't be a TUC either. If the RedHawks get upset, then they will never get the Record vs. TUC counted. Of course, by then, they'd have other problems, but you get the drift. If that does kick in, it means Miami will have won the CCHA semifinal, but then it better win the final too, or else it will just be 1-1 in those extra games. If Miami does win the CCHA title, it should be a No. 1 seed. If they lose before getting to Detroit, there could be nasty drop, but not so far to get it out of the tournament.

6.-9. Denver, Michigan State, Boston College, Minnesota State

All of these teams entertain the possibility of moving up to No. 1 seeds, with Denver having the best opportunity. Michigan State's best chance of picking up a comparison with a team above it, believe it or not, is with No. 1 Michigan. There's very little shot elsewhere. You're probably looking at a solid No. 2 seed there. Boston College should be safe for the NCAAs, but is in a precarious spot with the WCHA teams around it, like Minnesota State, St. Cloud State and Minnesota-Duluth. Minnesota State's biggest concern is also all the WCHA teams around it, which pick up spots thanks to all the intra-conference games which will take places in the next few weeks.

10. St. Cloud State / 12. Minnesota-Duluth / 14. Wisconsin / 15. Minnesota

At just 16-13-3, the Huskies are back and looking again, after once again failing to win an NCAA game last year. They, like the other three listed here — all WCHA teams — will be subject to the vagaries of the WCHA race over the next few weeks. These teams can all win or lose comparisons against each other at the drop of the hat, and whoever comes out the other side intact will get the spots. As many as seven WCHA can make the NCAAs, but by knocking each other around, a couple will probably get knocked off the bubble.

11. Clarkson

Clarkson's main concern to the down side is Wisconsin, and not much else. So there's not a lot of pressure pulling on Clarkson down. The Knights should be OK, and would go a long way with a win over Princeton this Friday. Getting to Albany and winning one game there will be plenty to get the Knights into the NCAAs for the second straight year.

13. Notre Dame

The Irish are barely hanging on to a few comparisons against teams below them. And the next four games they play will mean little in the Pairwise — unless they lose them, of course. So it's a precarious perch for the Irish, who probably need to reach the CCHA final to secure a bid.

16. Princeton

Finally, we reach poor Princeton. Yes, it sure looked magical for the Tigers after last weekend's sweep of Cornell and Colgate. You looked at the Pairwise and — WOW! — the Tigers were 12th. Princeton's only made the NCAAs once, winning the 1998 ECAC tournament. But then, you look at the Pairwise on Monday, and Princeton is down at No. 16, tied with Boston University. After not having played a game. Princeton got screwed, you say? No — Princeton got TUCed.

You see, after Saturday, Princeton was 2-7 against Teams Under Consideration, meaning that component was not yet counting in any of Princeton's comparisons with other teams. That was a good thing — for Princeton. Clearly, though, once the Tigers played another game against a TUC, things were going to change — because Princeton was barely winning three comparisons to WCHA teams that it would instantly lose once the Record vs. TUC kicked in.

Well, Princeton didn't have to wait until Friday for this to happen. Thanks to the Pairwise quirks, after Sunday's games, Cornell became a TUC. With that, Princeton's record against TUC — adding in two WINS against Cornell this season — improved the Tigers' Record vs. TUC to 4-7, which kicked that component into play, and made them LOSE the comparisons with three WCHA teams. You dizzy yet? Ahhh, the fun has only just begun.

17-20. Boston University, Providence, Northeastern, Vermont

Any of these teams still have a realistic chance to make the NCAAs, but it will still take a big run in the Hockey East tournament to do it. And in most cases, the team probably needs to win the tournament. All these teams will play each other, and other good teams in the conference, so it will all shake down that way.

Bookmark and Share E-MAIL PRINT

And once again, hands down, the WCHA continues to produce the most dominant teams in the NCAA.
Feb 26 2008, 2:18 am by Craig, Grand Forks

The "dominant" WCHA teams sure left their marks against Maine and BC in 2007, didn't they? The WCHA could have several things in its favor this year, as two league members host home-ice regionals and Sioux fans relish the prospect of FF chances if North Dakota gets sent east. But I wouldn't plan the championship parade routes in Grand Forks or Colorado Springs just yet....
Feb 26 2008, 9:21 am by

Maybe not, nameless, but your two examples don't mean much when you look at the overall recent history. Please read up on that before making smart remarks.
Feb 26 2008, 9:49 am by Chris Haake, Grand Forks ND

Entertaining article, nice work Woden. Looking top to bottom, the WCHA is clearly the strongest conference this year. To dispute this fact only makes you look silly. That being said, there are certainly some great teams outside of the WCHA. It is going to be fun as hell to watch how things shake out over the course of the next two months.
Feb 26 2008, 2:01 pm by Jamie, MN

Wodon not Woden! I mean "nice work Wodon." Sorry Adam.
Feb 26 2008, 2:03 pm by Jamie, MN

Thanks. No problem. It's better than suggesting I should be shot, as some other guy did. :)
Feb 26 2008, 2:23 pm by CHN Editor

That you be shot?!? He/she was obviously not the brightest . . . making comments on the web that could be interpreted as terroristic threats is never a good decision. Plus, don't people know that you and CHN have some badass attorney with mafia ties on retainer?
Feb 26 2008, 2:49 pm by Jamie, MN

Shhh... that's supposed to be quiet.
Feb 26 2008, 2:58 pm by CHN Editor

i think the sioux win out and maybe just lose final 5 title game to cc or cc loses to the sioux and they both get 1 seeds easily.....but the sioux play great out east in regioanls, hell they play good anywhere lately i guess. bring on miami anyday any rink.....go sioux, lets make it 4 frozen 4's in a row and win #8!! fear the oshie!!
Feb 26 2008, 4:03 pm by siouxme

I really don't know how the Sioux could be overtaken by Miami (for a one seed) if they play well and Miami plays better. Miami has Ohio St. left on it's schedule, not even a top 25 team. In previous years, Miami would have dropped (RPI) for winning games against OH St or like teams. NoDak has games against UMD (#10) and St.Cloud (#12). I'm not a Pairwise professor, but wouldn't splits against these two teams be better than Miami sweeping OH St? Also, wouldn't DU have a better chance of taking over a one seed if they sweep MTU and CC (assuming UND plays poorly), especially if the go on to win (unlikely) the WCHA tourney?
Feb 26 2008, 7:49 pm by Jeff, Fargo

Maybe I should have read further than 4. After reading the no. 5, and 6-9 recaps/predictions/whatever you want to call them, my question was answered. BTW, nice site CHN.
Feb 26 2008, 7:53 pm by Jeff, Fargo

Jeff ... take a look at the individual comparisons grid page here: http://www.collegehockeynews.com/ratings/ncaapwcr.php?grid=1 ... click on the Miami-NoDak comparison. There's very little to go on between the two teams, and if Miami plays a TUC any time and wins, it will have a big edge on North Dakota at that point, and immediately flip the comparison if everything else stays the same. Miami has to avoid losing to Michigan State, but even one loss to MSU wouldn't automatically hurt in this comparison, and Miami can only play MSU one more time max.
Feb 26 2008, 9:19 pm by CHN Editor

Love the article, but I wish it had a little more on teams on the bubble, who you think will get in, who you think will fall out, and maybe with teams on the bubble, who needs to do what to get in. We know Michigan, ND, Miami, CC, etc. are all in, not much more need be said. What about BU? I think taking 7 of the final possible eight points and an appearance in the semis of the HE tourny is enough to grant an at-large. (BU student, so some bias) Or other hockey east teams? UVM and BU are streaking, and NU and Prov are slumping badly. What has to happen for them to get back in the mix. Wisconsin played a fairly monstrous non-conf. schedule, and are barely on the inside looking out. What do they have to do to stay in? Are there any teams in now you think will fall out? Oooh, how about conference dark-horses that could take away at-large bids with upset conference tournament wins? (Note: An answer to this post is basically another article... hint) Great stuff though, keep writing
Feb 27 2008, 10:01 am by James, Boston

this blog is very hard to read. You have to scroll all the way down and move the scroller to the right so you can read someone's post. Why can't you just expand the blog area. It really makes it difficult to read. I though CHN would have something a little more user friendly.a Wodon, I think the sioux would love to get there hands on your Miami team and once and for all show you who is the better team. As I look through the field of 16 not one team stands out to me that could be the sioux. So stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
Feb 27 2008, 11:03 am by Chad, GF

Thanks. We're always working on making things better. The only reason for the scroll right now, though, is because of that link above. ... Anyway, question ... why is it "my" Miami team? And when did I say Miami is better than North Dakota? Can anyone cite that anywhere? Any why does everyone take everything so personally?
Feb 27 2008, 11:10 am by CHN Editor

I have no problem with the blog format. No scrolling needed for me. As far as no team standing out that could beat the Sioux, I'd be worried about UM (Mich, not Minn) and CC, and of course always, BC. Also, with the "one and out" format of the tournie, no team is a lock for the title.
Feb 27 2008, 5:25 pm by Jeff, Fargo

Adam, People take it personally because college hockey fans are not numerous but are very passionate, you know this. And to Chad in GF you've obviously been sticking too much in YOUR pipe lately if you think NoDak walks to the title. You probably thought that last year too right? And 2006, and 2005, and so on.
Feb 28 2008, 4:07 pm by JM, Minneapolis

Oh, of course I know that. But writing an article suggesting that Miami is not overrated, does not mean I am dissing anyone else - and it does not mean I am in the pocket of Miami - and it does not mean really anything except that it's an honest opinion .... Perspective ... you know? :)
Feb 28 2008, 4:23 pm by CHN Editor

Aahhh....perspective. This concept eludes most posters. Especially sioux fans, CCHA fans (all 8 of them), and Chuck in Peekskill. My god, what did you do to that guy, kill his dog or something?
Feb 28 2008, 4:40 pm by JM, Minneapolis

it would a miracle but dont rules of the gophers anything could happen
Feb 29 2008, 12:26 pm by SARGE, MN

Is the PWR a mystery to everyone? If the PWR was a college class, would it be a 400 level 4 credit class with a T and TR lab? I thought I had come to some conclusion on the workings on it this morning, and didn't think that UM or UNH could fall below the Sioux (technically, Mich hasn't). Is this why Ken came up with his own ranking system?
Mar 2 2008, 8:11 pm by Jeff, Fargo

Sarge, it looks like the gophers control their own destiny. However, in the case of this years team I think the saying goe; "***t in one hand and wish in the other and see which one fills up first."
Mar 2 2008, 8:48 pm by Jeff, Fargo

Jeff ... fairly simple explanation for North Dakota moving up. I explained some of it in our Roundup column - that's linked on the front page... www.collegehockeynews.com/news/gamegab.php
Mar 2 2008, 11:32 pm by CHN Editor

Nice job Wodon. The only teams that seem to be a lock for the Frozen Four are Michigan and CC. However, Michigan's record against WCHA opponents is pretty weak the last few years. If Michigan has to play a WCHA opponent......look out maze, your record against them the last few years has been well below average. Miami seems to be the team you wouldn't want to play. I don't see the WCHA as dominent as the other posters do, but then again I look at the big picture and actually watch other conference games. It'll be another great tourney. Wodon, use your clout and tell ESPN to start airing scores of college mens hockey sooner than the NCAA regionals. That is a joke.
Mar 11 2008, 1:09 pm by Joe, Mpls., MN

Comment on this Article

Log in or register to comment.

Or log in with your Facebook account:

Did you like this article?

Send Feedback | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

©2010 Adam Wodon. All Rights Reserved.