NCAA Tournament
PairWise Comparison Ratings
Note: This chart is updated as each game result comes in.
Figure out who will be in the NCAAs with You Are the Committee.
Note: These results could be subject to dramatic fluctuations once the Teams Under Consideration (TUC) criterion kicks in. Record vs. TUC is a main part of the comparisons, but only once a team has 10 such games played. See the primer for more information.
| Rk | Team | PCWs | W-L-T | Win % | Rk | RPI | Rk |
| 1 | Quinnipiac | 30 | 27-7-5 | .756 | 1 | .5714 | 1 |
| 2 | Minnesota | 29 | 26-8-5 | .731 | 2 | .5627 | 2 |
| 3 | Mass.-Lowell | 27 | 26-10-2 | .711 | 3 | .5558 | 3 |
| 4 | Notre Dame | 26 | 25-12-3 | .662 | 5t | .5497 | 4 |
| 5 | Miami | 25 | 24-11-5 | .662 | 5t | .5470 | 5 |
| 6 | Boston College | 25 | 22-11-4 | .649 | 7 | .5406 | 6 |
| 7 | New Hampshire | 24 | 19-11-7 | .608 | 12 | .5341 | 10 |
| 8 | North Dakota | 23 | 21-12-7 | .613 | 11 | .5368 | 8 |
| 9 | Denver | 20 | 20-13-5 | .592 | 15 | .5356 | 9 |
| 10 | Niagara | 20 | 23-9-5 | .689 | 4 | .5339 | 11 |
| 11 | Minnesota State | 19 | 24-13-3 | .637 | 8 | .5391 | 7 |
| 12 | Union | 19 | 21-12-5 | .618 | 10 | .5328 | 13 |
| 13 | St. Cloud State | 18 | 23-15-1 | .603 | 14 | .5316 | 15 |
| 14 | Wisconsin | 16 | 22-12-7 | .622 | 9 | .5334 | 12 |
| 15 | Yale | 16 | 18-12-3 | .591 | 16 | .5316 | 14 |
| 16 | Western Michigan | 15 | 19-11-8 | .605 | 13 | .5302 | 16 |
| 17 | Robert Morris | 14 | 20-14-4 | .579 | 18 | .5055 | 27 |
| 18 | Boston University | 13 | 21-16-2 | .564 | 20 | .5215 | 17 |
| 19 | Rensselaer | 13 | 18-14-5 | .554 | 21t | .5206 | 18 |
| 20 | Brown | 11 | 16-14-6 | .528 | 24 | .5139 | 20 |
| 21 | Alaska-Fairbanks | 11 | 17-16-4 | .514 | 28 | .5059 | 26 |
| 22 | Providence | 10 | 17-14-7 | .539 | 23 | .5195 | 19 |
| 23 | Dartmouth | 10 | 15-14-5 | .515 | 27 | .5096 | 22 |
| 24 | Cornell | 8 | 15-16-3 | .485 | 35 | .5076 | 23 |
| 25 | Colorado College | 7 | 18-19-5 | .488 | 32 | .5122 | 21 |
| 26 | St. Lawrence | 5 | 18-16-4 | .526 | 25 | .5059 | 25 |
| 27 | Ferris State | 4 | 16-16-5 | .500 | 31 | .5067 | 24 |
| 28 | Michigan | 4 | 18-19-3 | .487 | 33t | .5041 | 28 |
| 29 | Ohio State | 2 | 16-17-7 | .487 | 33t | .5037 | 29 |
| 30 | Nebraska-Omaha | 1 | 19-18-2 | .513 | 29 | .5025 | 30 |
| 31 | Holy Cross | 0 | 20-14-3 | .581 | 17 | .5018 | 31 |
| T U C L i n e | |||||||
| Connecticut | 19-14-4 | .568 | 19 | .4992 | 32 | ||
| Air Force | 17-13-7 | .554 | 21t | .4988 | 33 | ||
| Merrimack | 15-17-6 | .474 | 37 | .4950 | 34 | ||
| Mercyhurst | 19-17-5 | .524 | 26 | .4926 | 35 | ||
| Northern Michigan | 15-19-4 | .447 | 40 | .4918 | 36 | ||
| Canisius | 19-18-5 | .512 | 30 | .4906 | 37 | ||
| Bowling Green | 15-21-5 | .427 | 44 | .4888 | 38 | ||
| Colgate | 14-18-4 | .444 | 41 | .4871 | 39 | ||
| Lake Superior | 17-21-1 | .449 | 39 | .4860 | 40 | ||
| Minnesota-Duluth | 14-19-5 | .434 | 42 | .4831 | 41 | ||
| Penn State | 11-12-0 | .478 | 36 | .4793 | 42 | ||
| Massachusetts | 12-19-3 | .397 | 47 | .4791 | 43 | ||
| Maine | 11-19-8 | .395 | 48 | .4786 | 44 | ||
| Princeton | 10-16-5 | .403 | 46 | .4779 | 45 | ||
| Vermont | 11-19-6 | .389 | 49 | .4779 | 46 | ||
| Michigan Tech | 13-20-4 | .405 | 45 | .4773 | 47 | ||
| Michigan State | 14-25-3 | .369 | 51 | .4759 | 48 | ||
| RIT | 15-18-5 | .461 | 38 | .4755 | 49 | ||
| Clarkson | 9-20-7 | .347 | 53 | .4704 | 50 | ||
| Harvard | 10-19-3 | .359 | 52 | .4701 | 51 | ||
| American Int'l | 12-17-6 | .429 | 43 | .4598 | 52 | ||
| Northeastern | 9-21-4 | .324 | 54 | .4542 | 53 | ||
| Bentley | 12-20-3 | .386 | 50 | .4488 | 54 | ||
| Bemidji State | 6-22-8 | .278 | 56 | .4468 | 55 | ||
| Alaska-Anchorage | 4-25-7 | .208 | 57 | .4360 | 56 | ||
| Army | 7-22-5 | .279 | 55 | .4241 | 57 | ||
| Sacred Heart | 2-30-4 | .111 | 58 | .3833 | 58 | ||
| Alabama-Huntsville | 1-20-1 | .068 | 59 | .3774 | 59 | ||
Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.
Note: *-RPI is adjusted because "bad wins" have been discarded. These are wins that cause a team's RPI to go down. (Explanation)
Note: CHN endorses KRACH as a replacement for the RPI.
Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.
NCAA Tournament Info