NCAA 'Ratings Percentage Index'
Note: This chart is updated as each game result comes in.
| Rk | Team | RPI | Record | Sched Str | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rk | W-L-T | Win % | Rk | SOS | |||
| 1 | Miami | .6395 | 5 | 8-1-3 | .7917 | 1 | .5888 |
| 2 | Bemidji State | .6339 | 2 | 8-1-1 | .8500 | 2 | .5619 |
| 3 | Quinnipiac | .6219* | 1 | 8-1-0 | .8889 | 23 | .5170 |
| 4 | Michigan State | .6056 | 6 | 9-2-2 | .7692 | 6 | .5510 |
| 5 | North Dakota | .6014* | 7t | 7-2-1 | .7500 | 7 | .5507 |
| 6 | Massachusetts | .6003* | 3t | 8-2-0 | .8000 | 19 | .5271 |
| 7 | Mass.-Lowell | .5913 | 7t | 7-2-1 | .7500 | 14 | .5384 |
| 8 | Colorado College | .5776 | 7t | 7-2-1 | .7500 | 22 | .5201 |
| 9 | Wisconsin | .5764 | 13t | 6-3-1 | .6500 | 5 | .5518 |
| 10 | Denver | .5754 | 13t | 6-3-1 | .6500 | 8 | .5506 |
| 11 | Cornell | .5674* | 3t | 4-1-0 | .8000 | 40 | .4873 |
| 12 | Alaska | .5626* | 7t | 7-2-1 | .7500 | 38 | .4940 |
| 13 | Minnesota-Duluth | .5598 | 17 | 7-4-1 | .6250 | 15 | .5381 |
| 14 | Boston College | .5546 | 23 | 4-3-1 | .5625 | 4 | .5520 |
| 15 | Providence | .5492 | 11t | 6-3-0 | .6667 | 29 | .5100 |
| 16 | Ferris State | .5432 | 11t | 7-3-2 | .6667 | 34 | .5020 |
| 17 | Nebraska-Omaha | .5362* | 13t | 5-2-3 | .6500 | 35 | .4981 |
| 18 | Union | .5333* | 19t | 5-3-3 | .5909 | 30 | .5089 |
| 19 | St. Cloud State | .5313 | 26t | 4-4-2 | .5000 | 13 | .5418 |
| 20 | Notre Dame | .5284 | 26t | 5-5-3 | .5000 | 16 | .5378 |
| 21 | Princeton | .5224 | 21 | 3-2-1 | .5833 | 33 | .5022 |
| 22 | Merrimack | .5221 | 18 | 6-4-0 | .6000 | 37 | .4961 |
| 23 | Colgate | .5214 | 16 | 5-2-4 | .6364 | 43 | .4830 |
| 24 | Vermont | .5192 | 26t | 4-4-1 | .5000 | 20 | .5257 |
| 25 | Northern Michigan | .5182 | 38t | 3-5-2 | .4000 | 3 | .5576 |
| 26 | Western Michigan | .5171 | 24 | 5-4-1 | .5500 | 31 | .5061 |
| 27 | Rensselaer | .5101* | 22 | 7-5-1 | .5769 | 42 | .4858 |
| 28 | Northeastern | .5088 | 35t | 4-5-0 | .4444 | 17 | .5302 |
| 29 | Minnesota | .5083 | 34 | 4-5-1 | .4500 | 18 | .5277 |
| 30 | Maine | .5072 | 38t | 4-6-0 | .4000 | 11 | .5429 |
| 31 | Michigan | .5064 | 38t | 4-6-0 | .4000 | 12 | .5419 |
| 32 | New Hampshire | .4991 | 42 | 3-6-2 | .3636 | 10 | .5443 |
| 33 | Ohio State | .4982 | 31t | 5-6-1 | .4583 | 26 | .5115 |
| 34 | St. Lawrence | .4911 | 19t | 6-4-1 | .5909 | 46 | .4578 |
| 35 | Lake Superior | .4874 | 31t | 5-6-1 | .4583 | 36 | .4971 |
| 36 | Michigan Tech | .4847 | 47t | 3-7-0 | .3000 | 9 | .5463 |
| 37 | Boston University | .4762 | 45t | 3-6-0 | .3333 | 21 | .5239 |
| 38 | Robert Morris | .4706 | 43t | 3-6-1 | .3500 | 27 | .5108 |
| 39 | Air Force | .4685 | 26t | 5-5-2 | .5000 | 44 | .4580 |
| 40 | Yale | .4685 | 26t | 2-2-2 | .5000 | 45 | .4579 |
| 41 | Alaska-Anchorage | .4681 | 45t | 4-8-0 | .3333 | 25 | .5130 |
| 42 | Minnesota State | .4662 | 43t | 3-6-1 | .3500 | 32 | .5049 |
| 43 | Alabama-Huntsville | .4608 | 47t | 3-7-0 | .3000 | 24 | .5145 |
| 44 | RIT | .4583 | 25 | 6-5-0 | .5455 | 50 | .4292 |
| 45 | Bentley | .4437 | 35t | 3-4-2 | .4444 | 47 | .4435 |
| 46 | Canisius | .4436 | 31t | 5-6-1 | .4583 | 49 | .4387 |
| 47 | Sacred Heart | .4407 | 35t | 3-4-2 | .4444 | 48 | .4394 |
| 48 | Clarkson | .4347 | 51t | 3-8-0 | .2727 | 39 | .4887 |
| 49 | Bowling Green | .4201 | 56 | 1-8-1 | .1500 | 28 | .5102 |
| 50 | Holy Cross | .4199 | 38t | 3-5-2 | .4000 | 52 | .4266 |
| 51 | Niagara | .4106 | 55 | 1-8-2 | .1818 | 41 | .4869 |
| 52 | Harvard | .3904 | 47t | 1-3-1 | .3000 | 54 | .4205 |
| 53 | Army | .3751 | 51t | 2-7-2 | .2727 | 57 | .4093 |
| 54 | Connecticut | .3731 | 53 | 2-7-1 | .2500 | 55 | .4142 |
| 55 | American Int'l | .3705 | 50 | 2-6-1 | .2778 | 58 | .4014 |
| 56 | Mercyhurst | .3609 | 54 | 2-9-1 | .2083 | 56 | .4117 |
| 57 | Brown | .3413 | 57 | 0-5-1 | .0833 | 51 | .4272 |
| 58 | Dartmouth | .3159 | 58 | 0-5-0 | .0000 | 53 | .4212 |
Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.
Note: *-RPI is adjusted because "bad wins" have been discarded. These are wins that cause a team's RPI to go down. (Explanation)
Note: CHN endorses KRACH as a better method for rating teams.
NCAA Tournament Info