NCAA Tournament
Pairwise Comparison Ratings

Go to the Mobile Version of this page.

Note: This chart is updated as each game result comes in. This chart includes all new 2013-14 RPI effects, like home-road weighting and the 'Quality Win Bonus.'

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2003‑04 Season

Rk Team PCWs RPI Rk W-L-T Win % Rk
1 North Dakota 27 .6057 1 29-7-3 .7821
2 Boston College 27 .6007 2 27-8-4 .7436
3 Maine 27 .5983 3 30-7-3 .7875
4 Minnesota 25 .5882 4 26-13-3 .6548
5 Minnesota-Duluth 24 .5692 5 26-12-4 .6667
6 Ohio State 22 .5682 6 26-15-0 .6341
7 Michigan 22 .5585 7 26-13-2 .6585
8 Denver 21 .5525 8 23-12-5 .6375
9 Miami 20 .5415 11 23-13-4 .6250
10 New Hampshire 19 .5430 10 20-14-6 .5750
11 Wisconsin 18 .5492 9 21-12-8 .6098
12 Michigan State 17 .5390 12 24-15-2 .6098
13 Notre Dame 15 .5383 13 20-14-4 .5789
14 Colorado College 14 .5323 15 20-16-3 .5513
15 Cornell 14 .5236 18 16-10-6 .5938
16 Massachusetts 13 .5353 14 19-12-6 .5946
17 Colgate 13 .5199 21 22-12-5 .6282
18 Dartmouth 11 .5205 20 14-11-9 .5441
19 St. Cloud State 10 .5299 16 18-16-4 .5263
20 Boston University 9 .5246 17 12-17-9 .4342
21 Providence 9 .5208 19 16-14-7 .5270
22 Harvard 8 .5126 22 18-14-3 .5571
23 Holy Cross 6 .5073 23 22-9-4 .6857
24 Rensselaer 5 .5069 24 22-15-2 .5897
25 Northeastern 4 .5052 25 11-16-7 .4265
26 Western Michigan 3 .5046 26 17-18-4 .4872
27 Clarkson 2 .5025 27 18-18-5 .5000
28 Northern Michigan 1 .5008 29 21-16-4 .5610
29 Bemidji State 0 .5018 28 20-13-3 .5972
T U C   L i n e
Brown .4994 30 15-11-5 .565
Alaska-Anchorage .4987 31 14-23-3 .388
Niagara .4969 32 21-14-3 .592
Merrimack .4945 33 11-19-6 .389
Mercyhurst .4928 34 20-14-2 .583
Bowling Green .4882 35 11-18-9 .408
Alaska-Fairbanks .4830 36 16-19-1 .458
Ferris State .4830 37 15-20-3 .434
Union .4824 38 15-16-5 .486
St. Lawrence .4805 39 14-21-6 .415
Mass.-Lowell .4805 40 10-23-7 .338
Michigan Tech .4779 41 8-25-5 .276
Minnesota State .4750 42 10-24-5 .321
Yale .4700 43 12-19-0 .387
Quinnipiac .4689 44 15-14-6 .514
Alabama-Huntsville .4651 45 11-16-4 .419
Lake Superior .4644 46 9-20-7 .347
Sacred Heart .4626 47 14-17-5 .458
Nebraska-Omaha .4495 48 8-26-5 .269
Vermont .4483 49 9-22-4 .314
Connecticut .4469 50 12-16-7 .443
Findlay .4450 51 11-22-5 .355
Canisius .4375 52 10-16-8 .412
Air Force .4343 53 14-21-2 .405
Wayne State .4205 54 9-24-3 .292
Princeton .4198 55 5-24-2 .194
Bentley .4093 56 9-19-4 .344
Army .4000 57 8-18-3 .328
American Int'l .3701 58 5-25-4 .206

* - RPI is adjusted because "bad wins" have been discarded. These are wins that cause a team's RPI to go down. (Explanation)

† - 'Quality Win Bonus'. For complete explanation of this and other factors, see our complete primer.

‡ - 'Weighted WL %' is the team's winning percentage after adjusting for home/road effects. See our complete primer.

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Note: CHN endorses KRACH as a replacement for the RPI.

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2003‑04 Season

RkTeamPWsComparisons Won
1North Dakota27bc_minmndosumicdenmiaunhwismsundmcc_corumaclgdarstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
2Boston College27mneminmndosumicdenmiaunhwismsundmcc_corumaclgdarstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
3Maine27ndkminmndosumicdenmiaunhwismsundmcc_corumaclgdarstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
4Minnesota25mndosumicdenmiaunhwismsundmcc_corumaclgdarstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
5Minnesota-Duluth24osumicdenmiaunhwismsundmcc_corumaclgdarstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
6Ohio State22micdenunhwismsundmcc_corumaclgdarstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
7Michigan22denmiaunhwismsundmcc_corumaclgdarstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
8Denver21miaunhwismsundmcc_corumaclgdarstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
9Miami20osuwismsundmcc_corumaclgdarstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
10New Hampshire19miamsundmcc_corumaclgdarstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
11Wisconsin18unhmsundmcc_corumadarstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
12Michigan State17ndmcc_corumaclgdarstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
13Notre Dame15cc_corumadarstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
14Colorado College14corclgdarstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
15Cornell14umaclgdarstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
16Massachusetts13cc_darstcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
17Colgate13wisndmumadarstcharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
18Dartmouth11stcbu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
19St. Cloud State10bu_prvharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
20Boston University9clgprvhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
21Providence9clgharhcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
22Harvard8bu_hcrrennoewmuclknmubmj
23Holy Cross6rennoewmuclknmubmj
24Rensselaer5noewmuclknmubmj
25Northeastern4wmuclknmubmj
26Western Michigan3clknmubmj
27Clarkson2nmubmj
28Northern Michigan1bmj
29Bemidji State0

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Modify Date Parameters

Season

End Date    Format: YYYYMMDD

Modify Game Results

Modify Pairwise Criteria

Post-2013 Method

As of 2013-14, 'Record vs. TUC' was removed, and a 'Quality Win Bonus' was added, along with home-road weightings

Use Post-2013 Method Use Old Method

Last n Games

Use a 'Last n Games' criterion, and, if so, how many...

No      Yes     

RPI Weights

Win Pct.
Opponents' Win Pct.
Opponents' Opponents Win Pct.

Pairwise Tiebreaker

RPI     Individual head-to-head comparison

Send Feedback | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

©2017 College Hockey News.