NCAA Tournament
Pairwise Comparison Ratings

Go to the Mobile Version of this page.

Note: This chart is updated as each game result comes in. This chart includes all new 2013-14 RPI effects, like home-road weighting and the 'Quality Win Bonus.'

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2004‑05 Season

Rk Team PCWs RPI Rk W-L-T Win % Rk
1 Boston College 26 .5951 2 25-6-7 .7500
2 Colorado College 25 .5957 1 29-8-3 .7625
3 Denver 24 .5916 3 28-9-2 .7436
4 Minnesota 23 .5713 6 26-14-1 .6463
5 Cornell 22 .5915 4 26-4-3 .8333
6 Michigan 21 .5824 5 30-7-3 .7875
7 North Dakota 20 .5676 9 22-14-5 .5976
8 Harvard 19 .5693 8 21-9-3 .6818
9 New Hampshire 18 .5708 7 25-10-5 .6875
10 Maine 16 .5607 11 20-12-7 .6026
11 Ohio State 16 .5494 13 27-10-4 .7073
12 Boston University 14 .5675 10 23-13-4 .6250
13 Wisconsin 14 .5527 12 23-13-4 .6250
14 Colgate 13 .5468 14 25-10-3 .6974
15 Dartmouth 12 .5304 19 20-13-2 .6000
16 Michigan State 10 .5414 16 20-17-4 .5366
17 Mass.-Lowell 10 .5376 17 20-12-4 .6111
18 Vermont 10 .5362 18 21-14-4 .5897
19 Northern Michigan 8 .5239 20 22-11-7 .6375
20 Minnesota-Duluth 8 .5092 23 15-17-6 .4737
21 Northeastern 7 .5422 15 15-18-5 .4605
22 Bemidji State 4 .5179 21 23-12-1 .6528
23 Minnesota State 4 .5169 22 13-19-6 .4211
24 Alaska-Fairbanks 4 .5080 24 17-16-4 .5135
25 St. Cloud State 2 .5061 26 14-23-3 .3875
26 St. Lawrence 1 .5070 25 17-19-2 .4737
27 Alabama-Huntsville 0 .5044 27 18-10-4 .6250
T U C   L i n e
Brown .4993 28 16-14-3 .530
Nebraska-Omaha .4992 29 19-16-4 .538
Bowling Green .4984 30 16-16-4 .500
Alaska-Anchorage .4964 31 12-19-6 .405
Miami .4945 32 15-18-5 .461
Massachusetts .4899 33 13-23-2 .368
Michigan Tech .4894 34 8-25-4 .270
Western Michigan .4889 35 14-21-2 .405
Ferris State .4879 36 13-22-4 .385
Providence .4805 37 12-21-4 .378
Niagara .4787 38 15-19-2 .444
Lake Superior .4728 39 9-22-7 .329
Clarkson .4708 40 13-23-3 .372
Quinnipiac .4667 41 21-13-3 .608
Union .4653 42 13-22-2 .378
Mercyhurst .4645 43 18-15-4 .541
Wayne State .4595 44 14-17-4 .457
Holy Cross .4538 45 16-14-6 .528
Air Force .4527 46 14-19-3 .431
Rensselaer .4527 47 14-22-2 .395
Canisius .4472 48 16-15-4 .514
Merrimack .4469 49 8-26-2 .250
Notre Dame .4432 50 5-27-6 .211
Princeton .4332 51 8-20-3 .306
Yale .4324 52 5-25-2 .188
Sacred Heart .4308 53 13-21-1 .386
Robert Morris .4296 54 8-21-4 .303
Bentley .4003 55 8-20-6 .324
Connecticut .3971 56 11-23-3 .338
Army .3894 57 7-21-3 .274
American Int'l .3563 58 4-23-4 .194

* - RPI is adjusted because "bad wins" have been discarded. These are wins that cause a team's RPI to go down. (Explanation)

† - 'Quality Win Bonus'. For complete explanation of this and other factors, see our complete primer.

‡ - 'Weighted WL %' is the team's winning percentage after adjusting for home/road effects. See our complete primer.

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Note: CHN endorses KRACH as a replacement for the RPI.

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2004‑05 Season

RkTeamPWsComparisons Won
1Boston College26cc_denmincormicndkharunhmneosubu_wisclgdarmsuumluvmnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
2Colorado College25denmincormicndkharunhmneosubu_wisclgdarmsuumluvmnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
3Denver24mincormicndkharunhmneosubu_wisclgdarmsuumluvmnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
4Minnesota23cormicndkharunhmneosubu_wisclgdarmsuumluvmnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
5Cornell22micndkharunhmneosubu_wisclgdarmsuumluvmnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
6Michigan21ndkharunhmneosubu_wisclgdarmsuumluvmnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
7North Dakota20harunhmneosubu_wisclgdarmsuumluvmnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
8Harvard19unhmneosubu_wisclgdarmsuumluvmnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
9New Hampshire18mneosubu_wisclgdarmsuumluvmnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
10Maine16osuwisclgdarmsuumluvmnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
11Ohio State16bu_wisclgdarmsuumluvmnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
12Boston University14mneclgdarmsuumluvmnmunoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
13Wisconsin14bu_clgmsuumluvmnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
14Colgate13darmsuumluvmnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
15Dartmouth12wismsuuvmnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
16Michigan State10umluvmmndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
17Mass.-Lowell10darnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
18Vermont10umlnmumndnoebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
19Northern Michigan8msumndbmjmnsakfstcstlalh
20Minnesota-Duluth8bu_noebmjmnsakfstcstlalh
21Northeastern7nmubmjmnsakfstcstlalh
22Bemidji State4mnsstcstlalh
23Minnesota State4akfstcstlalh
24Alaska-Fairbanks4bmjstcstlalh
25St. Cloud State2stlalh
26St. Lawrence1alh
27Alabama-Huntsville0

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Modify Date Parameters

Season

End Date    Format: YYYYMMDD

Modify Game Results

Modify Pairwise Criteria

Post-2013 Method

As of 2013-14, 'Record vs. TUC' was removed, and a 'Quality Win Bonus' was added, along with home-road weightings

Use Post-2013 Method Use Old Method

Last n Games

Use a 'Last n Games' criterion, and, if so, how many...

No      Yes     

RPI Weights

Win Pct.
Opponents' Win Pct.
Opponents' Opponents Win Pct.

Pairwise Tiebreaker

RPI     Individual head-to-head comparison

Send Feedback | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

©2017 College Hockey News.