NCAA Tournament
Pairwise Comparison Ratings

Go to the Mobile Version of this page.

Note: This chart is updated as each game result comes in. This chart includes all new 2013-14 RPI effects, like home-road weighting and the 'Quality Win Bonus.'

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2005‑06 Season

Rk Team PCWs RPI Rk W-L-T Win % Rk
1 Wisconsin 30 .5788 1 26-10-3 .7051
2 Minnesota 29 .5784 2 27-8-5 .7375
3 Boston University 28 .5729 3 25-9-4 .7105
4 Michigan State 27 .5728 4 24-11-8 .6512
5 Harvard 26 .5692 5 21-11-2 .6471
6 Miami 24 .5637 6 26-8-4 .7368
7 North Dakota 24 .5607 7 27-15-1 .6395
8 Cornell 24 .5520 8 21-8-4 .6970
9 Michigan 22 .5484 9 21-14-5 .5875
10 Colorado College 21 .5481 10 24-15-2 .6098
11 Boston College 20 .5449 11 23-12-3 .6447
12 Maine 18 .5446 12 26-11-2 .6923
13 New Hampshire 18 .5421 13 20-12-7 .6026
14 Nebraska-Omaha 18 .5368 15 20-14-6 .5750
15 Dartmouth 16 .5411 14 19-12-2 .6061
16 Denver 14 .5281 17 21-15-3 .5769
17 Northern Michigan 14 .5246 21 22-16-2 .5750
18 St. Cloud State 11 .5272 18 22-16-4 .5714
19 Alaska-Fairbanks 11 .5253 19 18-16-5 .5256
20 Ferris State 11 .5248 20 17-15-8 .5250
21 Holy Cross 8 .5351 16 26-9-2 .7297
22 Ohio State 8 .5146 23 15-19-5 .4487
23 Lake Superior 8 .5077 25 15-14-7 .5139
24 Vermont 8 .5073 27 18-14-6 .5526
25 St. Lawrence 7 .5118 24 21-17-2 .5500
26 Colgate 6 .5217 22 20-13-6 .5897
27 Minnesota State 4 .5031 30 17-18-4 .4872
28 Providence 3 .5075 26 17-16-3 .5139
29 Niagara 3 .5059 28 20-15-1 .5694
30 Bemidji State 3 .5036 29 20-13-3 .5972
31 Clarkson 1 .5010 31 18-17-3 .5132
T U C   L i n e
Sacred Heart .4996 32 21-12-2 .629
Mercyhurst .4977 33 22-13-1 .625
Notre Dame .4915 34 13-19-4 .417
Quinnipiac .4907 35 20-18-1 .526
Rensselaer .4880 36 14-17-6 .459
Mass.-Lowell .4867 37 14-20-2 .417
Massachusetts .4817 38 13-21-2 .389
Alabama-Huntsville .4801 39 19-13-2 .588
Minnesota-Duluth .4779 40 11-25-4 .325
Union .4770 41 16-16-6 .500
Western Michigan .4756 42 10-24-6 .325
Bowling Green .4730 43 13-23-2 .368
Princeton .4714 44 10-18-3 .371
Bentley .4710 45 15-17-5 .473
Michigan Tech .4679 46 7-25-6 .263
Yale .4640 47 10-20-3 .348
Army .4554 48 12-18-6 .417
Brown .4524 49 5-20-7 .266
Alaska-Anchorage .4506 50 6-27-3 .208
Northeastern .4391 51 3-24-7 .191
Robert Morris .4351 52 12-20-3 .386
Connecticut .4301 53 11-23-2 .333
Merrimack .4241 54 6-23-5 .250
Wayne State .4234 55 6-23-6 .257
Canisius .4215 56 10-23-2 .314
Air Force .4197 57 11-20-1 .359
American Int'l .4194 58 6-21-5 .266
RIT .3888 59 4-21-2 .185

* - RPI is adjusted because "bad wins" have been discarded. These are wins that cause a team's RPI to go down. (Explanation)

† - 'Quality Win Bonus'. For complete explanation of this and other factors, see our complete primer.

‡ - 'Weighted WL %' is the team's winning percentage after adjusting for home/road effects. See our complete primer.

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Note: CHN endorses KRACH as a replacement for the RPI.

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2005‑06 Season

RkTeamPWsComparisons Won
1Wisconsin30minbu_msuharmiandkcormiccc_bc_mneunhunodardennmustcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
2Minnesota29bu_msuharmiandkcormiccc_bc_mneunhunodardennmustcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
3Boston University28msuharmiandkcormiccc_bc_mneunhunodardennmustcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
4Michigan State27harmiandkcormiccc_bc_mneunhunodardennmustcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
5Harvard26miandkcormiccc_bc_mneunhunodardennmustcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
6Miami24ndkmiccc_bc_mneunhunodardennmustcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
7North Dakota24cormiccc_bc_mneunhunodardennmustcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
8Cornell24miamiccc_bc_mneunhunodardennmustcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
9Michigan22cc_bc_mneunhunodardennmustcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
10Colorado College21bc_mneunhunodardennmustcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
11Boston College20mneunhunodardennmustcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
12Maine18unhdardennmustcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
13New Hampshire18unodardennmustcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
14Nebraska-Omaha18mnedardennmustcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
15Dartmouth16dennmustcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
16Denver14nmustcakffsuosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
17Northern Michigan14stcakffsuhcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
18St. Cloud State11akffsuosulssstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
19Alaska-Fairbanks11fsuhcrosulssstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
20Ferris State11hcrosulssverstlclgmnsprvniabmjclk
21Holy Cross8denstcosuverstlclgbmjclk
22Ohio State8lssverstlmnsprvniabmjclk
23Lake Superior8hcrverclgmnsprvniabmjclk
24Vermont8stcakfclgmnsprvniabmjclk
25St. Lawrence7lssvermnsprvniabmjclk
26Colgate6osustlprvniabmjclk
27Minnesota State4hcrclgprvclk
28Providence3hcrniaclk
29Niagara3hcrmnsbmj
30Bemidji State3mnsprvclk
31Clarkson1nia

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Modify Date Parameters

Season

End Date    Format: YYYYMMDD

Modify Game Results

Modify Pairwise Criteria

Post-2013 Method

As of 2013-14, 'Record vs. TUC' was removed, and a 'Quality Win Bonus' was added, along with home-road weightings

Use Post-2013 Method Use Old Method

Last n Games

Use a 'Last n Games' criterion, and, if so, how many...

No      Yes     

RPI Weights

Win Pct.
Opponents' Win Pct.
Opponents' Opponents Win Pct.

Pairwise Tiebreaker

RPI     Individual head-to-head comparison

Send Feedback | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

©2017 College Hockey News.