NCAA Tournament
Pairwise Comparison Ratings

Go to the Mobile Version of this page.

Note: This chart is updated as each game result comes in. This chart includes all new 2013-14 RPI effects, like home-road weighting and the 'Quality Win Bonus.'

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2006‑07 Season

Rk Team PCWs RPI Rk W-L-T Win % Rk
1 Minnesota 24 .5840 1 30-9-3 .7500
2 Notre Dame 23 .5815 2 31-6-3 .8125
3 Clarkson 22 .5645 3 25-8-5 .7237
4 New Hampshire 21 .5618 5 26-10-2 .7105
5 Boston College 20 .5603 6 26-11-1 .6974
6 St. Cloud State 19 .5621 4 22-10-7 .6538
7 Boston University 17 .5447 9 20-9-9 .6447
8 Michigan 16 .5495 8 26-13-1 .6625
9 Michigan State 16 .5400 10 22-13-3 .6184
10 North Dakota 15 .5542 7 22-13-5 .6125
11 St. Lawrence 13 .5384 11 23-13-2 .6316
12 Maine 13 .5372 12 21-14-2 .5946
13 Massachusetts 13 .5328 15 20-12-5 .6081
14 Miami 12 .5353 13 23-13-4 .6250
15 Denver 10 .5329 14 21-15-4 .5750
16 Wisconsin 10 .5292 16 19-18-4 .5122
17 Michigan Tech 8 .5223 21 18-17-5 .5125
18 Colorado College 7 .5232 20 18-17-4 .5128
19 Dartmouth 6 .5280 17 18-12-3 .5909
20 Vermont 5 .5232 19 18-16-5 .5256
21 Quinnipiac 4 .5238 18 21-14-5 .5875
22 Cornell 3 .5071 23 14-13-4 .5161
23 Lake Superior 2 .5129 22 21-19-3 .5233
24 Nebraska-Omaha 1 .5055 24 18-16-8 .5238
25 RIT 0 .5054 25 21-11-2 .6471
T U C   L i n e
Minnesota State .5041 26 13-19-6 .421
Niagara .5040 27 18-13-6 .568
Western Michigan .5036 28 18-18-1 .500
Sacred Heart .5033 29 21-11-4 .639
Harvard .4989 30 14-17-2 .455
Ohio State .4975 31 15-17-5 .473
Northeastern .4940 32 13-18-5 .431
Princeton .4929 33 15-16-3 .485
Alaska-Anchorage .4913 34 13-21-3 .392
Bemidji State .4905 35 14-14-5 .500
Minnesota-Duluth .4902 36 13-21-5 .397
Army .4840 37 17-12-5 .574
Union .4833 38 14-19-3 .431
Colgate .4824 39 15-21-4 .425
Air Force .4807 40 19-15-5 .551
Yale .4806 41 11-17-3 .403
Ferris State .4790 42 14-22-3 .397
Northern Michigan .4784 43 15-24-2 .390
Brown .4761 44 11-15-6 .438
Rensselaer .4748 45 10-18-8 .389
Robert Morris .4695 46 14-19-2 .429
Alaska .4655 47 11-22-6 .359
Providence .4648 48 10-23-3 .319
Alabama-Huntsville .4628 49 13-19-3 .414
Connecticut .4612 50 16-18-2 .472
Mass.-Lowell .4579 51 8-21-7 .319
Wayne State .4551 52 12-21-2 .371
Bentley .4341 53 12-22-1 .357
Holy Cross .4323 54 10-20-5 .357
Bowling Green .4305 55 7-29-2 .211
Mercyhurst .4294 56 9-20-6 .343
Canisius .4201 57 9-23-3 .300
Merrimack .4134 58 3-27-4 .147
American Int'l .4064 59 8-25-1 .250

* - RPI is adjusted because "bad wins" have been discarded. These are wins that cause a team's RPI to go down. (Explanation)

† - 'Quality Win Bonus'. For complete explanation of this and other factors, see our complete primer.

‡ - 'Weighted WL %' is the team's winning percentage after adjusting for home/road effects. See our complete primer.

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Note: CHN endorses KRACH as a replacement for the RPI.

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2006‑07 Season

RkTeamPWsComparisons Won
1Minnesota24ndmclkunhbc_stcbu_micmsundkstlmneumamiadenwismtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
2Notre Dame23clkunhbc_stcbu_micmsundkstlmneumamiadenwismtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
3Clarkson22unhbc_stcbu_micmsundkstlmneumamiadenwismtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
4New Hampshire21bc_stcbu_micmsundkstlmneumamiadenwismtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
5Boston College20stcbu_micmsundkstlmneumamiadenwismtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
6St. Cloud State19bu_micmsundkstlmneumamiadenwismtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
7Boston University17micndkstlmneumamiadenwismtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
8Michigan16msustlmneumamiadenwismtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
9Michigan State16bu_stlmneumamiadenwismtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
10North Dakota15micmsustlmiadenwismtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
11St. Lawrence13mnemiadenwismtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
12Maine13ndkmiadenwismtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
13Massachusetts13ndkstlmnewismtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
14Miami12umadenwismtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
15Denver10umamtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
16Wisconsin10denmtucc_darverquicorlssunorit
17Michigan Tech8cc_darverquicorlssunorit
18Colorado College7darverquicorlssunorit
19Dartmouth6verquicorlssunorit
20Vermont5quicorlssunorit
21Quinnipiac4corlssunorit
22Cornell3lssunorit
23Lake Superior2unorit
24Nebraska-Omaha1rit
25RIT0

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Modify Date Parameters

Season

End Date    Format: YYYYMMDD

Modify Game Results

Modify Pairwise Criteria

Post-2013 Method

As of 2013-14, 'Record vs. TUC' was removed, and a 'Quality Win Bonus' was added, along with home-road weightings

Use Post-2013 Method Use Old Method

Last n Games

Use a 'Last n Games' criterion, and, if so, how many...

No      Yes     

RPI Weights

Win Pct.
Opponents' Win Pct.
Opponents' Opponents Win Pct.

Pairwise Tiebreaker

RPI     Individual head-to-head comparison

Send Feedback | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

©2017 College Hockey News.