NCAA Tournament
Pairwise Comparison Ratings

Go to the Mobile Version of this page.

Note: This chart is updated as each game result comes in. This chart includes all new 2013-14 RPI effects, like home-road weighting and the 'Quality Win Bonus.'

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2007‑08 Season

Rk Team PCWs RPI Rk W-L-T Win % Rk
1 Michigan 24 .5938 1 30-5-4 .8205
2 Miami 23 .5854 2 32-6-1 .8333
3 New Hampshire 22 .5716 5 25-9-3 .7162
4 Colorado College 21 .5849 3 28-10-1 .7308
5 North Dakota 20 .5793 4 25-10-4 .6923
6 Denver 18 .5646 6 25-13-1 .6538
7 Boston College 18 .5454 8 20-11-8 .6154
8 St. Cloud State 17 .5396 9 19-15-5 .5513
9 Michigan State 16 .5510 7 24-11-5 .6625
10 Clarkson 16 .5358 10 21-12-4 .6216
11 Minnesota 14 .5350 11 19-15-9 .5465
12 Minnesota State 11 .5276 14 19-16-4 .5385
13 Notre Dame 10 .5337 12 24-14-4 .6190
14 Harvard 10 .5245 15 17-12-4 .5758
15 Wisconsin 10 .5234 16 15-16-7 .4868
16 Vermont 9 .5225 17 17-14-7 .5395
17 Princeton 8 .5276 13 20-13-0 .6061
18 Massachusetts 7 .5072 24 14-16-6 .4722
19 Boston University 6 .5207 18 19-17-4 .5250
20 Minnesota-Duluth 6 .5138 20 13-17-6 .4444
21 Cornell 4 .5144 19 18-14-3 .5571
22 Niagara 4 .5108 21 22-10-4 .6667
23 Michigan Tech 4 .5094 22 14-20-5 .4231
24 Quinnipiac 2 .5093 23 20-15-4 .5641
25 Air Force 0 .5069 25 21-11-6 .6316
T U C   L i n e
Northeastern .5067 26 16-18-3 .473
Northern Michigan .5061 27 19-20-4 .488
Mass.-Lowell .5044 28 16-17-4 .486
Providence .5033 29 14-17-5 .458
Ferris State .5019 30 18-16-5 .526
Yale .5014 31 16-14-4 .529
Colgate .5005 32 18-17-6 .512
Union .5002 33 15-14-6 .514
Nebraska-Omaha .4965 34 17-19-4 .475
RIT .4950 35 19-12-6 .595
Maine .4943 36 13-18-3 .426
Bowling Green .4916 37 18-21-0 .462
Dartmouth .4854 38 12-16-4 .438
Bemidji State .4842 39 17-16-3 .514
Merrimack .4837 40 12-18-4 .412
Army .4776 41 19-14-4 .568
Alaska-Anchorage .4741 42 7-21-8 .306
Lake Superior .4741 43 10-20-7 .365
St. Lawrence .4732 44 13-20-4 .405
Robert Morris .4730 45 15-15-4 .500
Ohio State .4643 46 12-25-4 .341
Mercyhurst .4642 47 15-19-7 .451
Rensselaer .4616 48 11-23-4 .342
Alaska .4588 49 9-21-5 .329
Sacred Heart .4576 50 16-19-3 .461
Canisius .4447 51 11-20-6 .378
Brown .4389 52 6-21-4 .258
Holy Cross .4363 53 10-19-7 .375
Connecticut .4354 54 13-21-3 .392
Western Michigan .4324 55 8-27-3 .250
Wayne State .4289 56 11-25-2 .316
Bentley .4255 57 9-21-6 .333
American Int'l .4113 58 8-23-5 .292
Alabama-Huntsville .4104 59 6-21-4 .258

* - RPI is adjusted because "bad wins" have been discarded. These are wins that cause a team's RPI to go down. (Explanation)

† - 'Quality Win Bonus'. For complete explanation of this and other factors, see our complete primer.

‡ - 'Weighted WL %' is the team's winning percentage after adjusting for home/road effects. See our complete primer.

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Note: CHN endorses KRACH as a replacement for the RPI.

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2007‑08 Season

RkTeamPWsComparisons Won
1Michigan24miaunhcc_ndkdenbc_stcmsuclkminmnsndmharwisverprnumabu_mndcorniamtuquiafa
2Miami23unhcc_ndkdenbc_stcmsuclkminmnsndmharwisverprnumabu_mndcorniamtuquiafa
3New Hampshire22cc_ndkdenbc_stcmsuclkminmnsndmharwisverprnumabu_mndcorniamtuquiafa
4Colorado College21ndkdenbc_stcmsuclkminmnsndmharwisverprnumabu_mndcorniamtuquiafa
5North Dakota20denbc_stcmsuclkminmnsndmharwisverprnumabu_mndcorniamtuquiafa
6Denver18stcmsuclkminmnsndmharwisverprnumabu_mndcorniamtuquiafa
7Boston College18denstcmsuminmnsndmharwisverprnumabu_mndcorniamtuquiafa
8St. Cloud State17msuclkminmnsndmharwisverprnumabu_mndcorniamtuquiafa
9Michigan State16clkminmnsndmharwisverprnumabu_mndcorniamtuquiafa
10Clarkson16bc_minmnsndmharwisverprnumabu_mndcorniamtuquiafa
11Minnesota14mnsndmharwisverprnumabu_mndcorniamtuquiafa
12Minnesota State11harwisverumabu_mndcorniamtuquiafa
13Notre Dame10mnsharwisprnbu_mndcorniaquiafa
14Harvard10wisverumabu_mndcorniamtuquiafa
15Wisconsin10verprnumabu_mndcorniamtuquiafa
16Vermont9ndmumabu_mndcorniamtuquiafa
17Princeton8mnsharverbu_corniaquiafa
18Massachusetts7ndmprnmndcormtuquiafa
19Boston University6umamndcorniamtuafa
20Minnesota-Duluth6prncorniamtuquiafa
21Cornell4niamtuquiafa
22Niagara4umamtuquiafa
23Michigan Tech4ndmprnquiafa
24Quinnipiac2bu_afa
25Air Force0

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Modify Date Parameters

Season

End Date    Format: YYYYMMDD

Modify Game Results

Modify Pairwise Criteria

Post-2013 Method

As of 2013-14, 'Record vs. TUC' was removed, and a 'Quality Win Bonus' was added, along with home-road weightings

Use Post-2013 Method Use Old Method

Last n Games

Use a 'Last n Games' criterion, and, if so, how many...

No      Yes     

RPI Weights

Win Pct.
Opponents' Win Pct.
Opponents' Opponents Win Pct.

Pairwise Tiebreaker

RPI     Individual head-to-head comparison

Send Feedback | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

©2017 College Hockey News.