NCAA Tournament
Pairwise Comparison Ratings

Go to the Mobile Version of this page.

Note: This chart is updated as each game result comes in. This chart includes all new 2013-14 RPI effects, like home-road weighting and the 'Quality Win Bonus.'

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2008‑09 Season

Rk Team PCWs RPI Rk W-L-T Win % Rk
1 Boston University 24 .5963 1 31-6-4 .8049
2 Notre Dame 23 .5908 2 31-5-3 .8333
3 Denver 22 .5594 5 23-11-5 .6538
4 Michigan 21 .5698 3 29-11-0 .7250
5 Yale 20 .5554 6 24-7-2 .7576
6 Northeastern 18 .5621 4 25-11-4 .6750
7 Minnesota-Duluth 18 .5443 8 21-12-8 .6098
8 North Dakota 17 .5439 9 24-14-4 .6190
9 Vermont 16 .5499 7 20-11-5 .6250
10 New Hampshire 15 .5423 10 19-12-5 .5972
11 Cornell 14 .5405 11 21-9-4 .6765
12 Princeton 13 .5367 13 22-11-1 .6618
13 Miami 12 .5369 12 20-12-5 .6081
14 Air Force 11 .5339 14 27-10-2 .7179
15 Ohio State 9 .5338 15 23-14-4 .6098
16 Wisconsin 9 .5336 16 20-16-4 .5500
17 Minnesota 9 .5328 20 17-13-7 .5541
18 Boston College 6 .5333 17 18-14-5 .5541
19 St. Lawrence 6 .5330 19 21-12-5 .6184
20 Colorado College 5 .5241 21 16-12-10 .5526
21 Mass.-Lowell 4 .5331 18 20-16-2 .5526
22 St. Cloud State 4 .5169 22 18-17-3 .5132
23 Northern Michigan 3 .5164 23 19-17-5 .5244
24 Alaska 1 .5105 24 17-16-6 .5128
25 Minnesota State 0 .5092 25 15-17-6 .4737
T U C   L i n e
RIT .5076 26 23-13-2 .632
Alaska-Anchorage .5071 27 14-17-5 .458
Massachusetts .5020 28 16-20-3 .449
Union .5013 29 19-17-3 .526
Nebraska-Omaha .4974 30 15-17-8 .475
Mercyhurst .4959 31 22-15-3 .588
Dartmouth .4941 32 14-14-3 .500
Maine .4888 33 13-22-4 .385
Quinnipiac .4885 34 18-18-3 .500
Bentley .4848 35 19-17-2 .526
Western Michigan .4840 36 14-20-7 .427
Bemidji State .4824 37 18-15-1 .544
Colgate .4761 38 12-18-7 .419
Michigan State .4753 39 10-23-5 .329
Lake Superior .4734 40 11-20-8 .385
Ferris State .4726 41 12-19-7 .408
Niagara .4716 42 16-14-6 .528
Harvard .4679 43 9-16-6 .387
Clarkson .4644 44 10-19-7 .375
Bowling Green .4644 45 11-24-3 .329
Merrimack .4636 46 9-21-4 .324
Canisius .4624 47 15-16-6 .486
Providence .4594 48 7-22-5 .279
Michigan Tech .4556 49 6-25-7 .250
Holy Cross .4530 50 13-20-5 .408
Rensselaer .4474 51 10-27-2 .282
Army .4441 52 11-19-6 .389
Sacred Heart .4382 53 11-23-4 .342
Robert Morris .4318 54 10-19-7 .375
Brown .4274 55 5-23-5 .227
Connecticut .4211 56 9-26-2 .270
Alabama-Huntsville .4013 57 5-20-5 .250
American Int'l .3832 58 5-28-2 .171

* - RPI is adjusted because "bad wins" have been discarded. These are wins that cause a team's RPI to go down. (Explanation)

† - 'Quality Win Bonus'. For complete explanation of this and other factors, see our complete primer.

‡ - 'Weighted WL %' is the team's winning percentage after adjusting for home/road effects. See our complete primer.

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Note: CHN endorses KRACH as a replacement for the RPI.

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2008‑09 Season

RkTeamPWsComparisons Won
1Boston University24ndmdenmicyalnoemndndkverunhcorprnmiaafaosuwisminbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
2Notre Dame23denmicyalnoemndndkverunhcorprnmiaafaosuwisminbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
3Denver22micyalnoemndndkverunhcorprnmiaafaosuwisminbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
4Michigan21yalnoemndndkverunhcorprnmiaafaosuwisminbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
5Yale20noemndndkverunhcorprnmiaafaosuwisminbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
6Northeastern18mndverunhcorprnmiaafaosuwisminbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
7Minnesota-Duluth18ndkverunhcorprnmiaafaosuwisminbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
8North Dakota17noeunhcorprnmiaafaosuwisminbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
9Vermont16ndkunhcorprnmiaafaosuwisbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
10New Hampshire15corprnmiaafaosuwisminbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
11Cornell14prnmiaafaosuwisminbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
12Princeton13miaafaosuwisminbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
13Miami12afaosuwisminbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
14Air Force11osuwisminbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
15Ohio State9wisminbc_stlcc_umlnmuakfmns
16Wisconsin9minbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
17Minnesota9verbc_stlcc_umlstcnmuakfmns
18Boston College6stlcc_stcnmuakfmns
19St. Lawrence6cc_umlstcnmuakfmns
20Colorado College5umlstcnmuakfmns
21Mass.-Lowell4bc_stcakfmns
22St. Cloud State4osunmuakfmns
23Northern Michigan3umlakfmns
24Alaska1mns
25Minnesota State0

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Modify Date Parameters

Season

End Date    Format: YYYYMMDD

Modify Game Results

Modify Pairwise Criteria

Post-2013 Method

As of 2013-14, 'Record vs. TUC' was removed, and a 'Quality Win Bonus' was added, along with home-road weightings

Use Post-2013 Method Use Old Method

Last n Games

Use a 'Last n Games' criterion, and, if so, how many...

No      Yes     

RPI Weights

Win Pct.
Opponents' Win Pct.
Opponents' Opponents Win Pct.

Pairwise Tiebreaker

RPI     Individual head-to-head comparison

Send Feedback | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

©2017 College Hockey News.