NCAA Tournament
Pairwise Comparison Ratings

Go to the Mobile Version of this page.

Note: This chart is updated as each game result comes in. This chart includes all new 2013-14 RPI effects, like home-road weighting and the 'Quality Win Bonus.'

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2009‑10 Season

Rk Team PCWs RPI Rk W-L-T Win % Rk
1 Miami 24 .5793 1 27-7-7 .7439
2 Denver 23 .5766 2 27-9-4 .7250
3 Wisconsin 22 .5685 3 25-10-4 .6923
4 Boston College 21 .5625 4 25-10-3 .6974
5 North Dakota 20 .5623 5 25-12-5 .6548
6 St. Cloud State 19 .5504 6 23-13-5 .6220
7 Cornell 18 .5462 7 21-8-4 .6970
8 Bemidji State 17 .5429 8 23-9-4 .6944
9 Yale 16 .5367 9 20-9-3 .6719
10 Northern Michigan 15 .5348 10 20-12-8 .6000
11 New Hampshire 11 .5330 13 17-13-7 .5541
12 Michigan 11 .5316 14 25-17-1 .5930
13 Alaska 11 .5299 15 18-11-9 .5921
14 Vermont 11 .5261 16 17-14-7 .5395
15 Ferris State 10 .5334 11 21-13-6 .6000
16 Michigan State 10 .5254 17 19-13-6 .5789
17 Minnesota-Duluth 9 .5331 12 22-17-1 .5625
18 Maine 8 .5212 20 19-17-3 .5256
19 Union 6 .5231 19 21-12-6 .6154
20 Colorado College 4 .5244 18 19-17-3 .5256
21 Nebraska-Omaha 4 .5192 21 20-16-6 .5476
22 Mass.-Lowell 4 .5173 23 19-16-4 .5385
23 Boston University 3 .5172 25 18-17-3 .5132
24 Minnesota 2 .5192 22 18-19-2 .4872
25 RIT 1 .5173 24 26-11-1 .6974
T U C   L i n e
Massachusetts .5112 26 18-18-0 .500
Northeastern .5106 27 16-16-2 .500
Ohio State .5088 28 15-18-6 .462
Minnesota State .5036 29 16-20-3 .449
Merrimack .5027 30 16-19-2 .459
St. Lawrence .5013 31 19-16-7 .536
Lake Superior .4967 32 15-18-5 .461
Quinnipiac .4966 33 20-18-2 .525
Sacred Heart .4955 34 21-13-4 .605
Rensselaer .4949 35 18-17-4 .513
Notre Dame .4918 36 13-17-8 .447
Colgate .4907 37 15-15-6 .500
Alaska-Anchorage .4785 38 11-23-2 .333
Princeton .4762 39 12-16-3 .435
Air Force .4731 40 16-15-6 .514
Providence .4693 41 10-20-4 .353
Brown .4686 42 13-20-4 .405
Canisius .4680 43 17-15-5 .527
Western Michigan .4674 44 8-20-8 .333
Alabama-Huntsville .4667 45 12-17-3 .422
Niagara .4616 46 12-20-4 .389
Robert Morris .4611 47 10-19-6 .371
Dartmouth .4564 48 10-19-3 .359
Harvard .4532 49 9-21-3 .318
Mercyhurst .4468 50 15-20-3 .434
Army .4446 51 11-18-7 .403
Clarkson .4429 52 9-24-4 .297
Holy Cross .4424 53 12-19-6 .405
Michigan Tech .4382 54 5-30-1 .153
Bowling Green .4369 55 5-25-6 .222
Bentley .4368 56 12-19-4 .400
Connecticut .4008 57 7-27-3 .230
American Int'l .3912 58 5-24-4 .212

* - RPI is adjusted because "bad wins" have been discarded. These are wins that cause a team's RPI to go down. (Explanation)

† - 'Quality Win Bonus'. For complete explanation of this and other factors, see our complete primer.

‡ - 'Weighted WL %' is the team's winning percentage after adjusting for home/road effects. See our complete primer.

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Note: CHN endorses KRACH as a replacement for the RPI.

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2009‑10 Season

RkTeamPWsComparisons Won
1Miami24denwisbc_ndkstccorbmjyalnmuunhmicakfverfsumsumndmneunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
2Denver23wisbc_ndkstccorbmjyalnmuunhmicakfverfsumsumndmneunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
3Wisconsin22bc_ndkstccorbmjyalnmuunhmicakfverfsumsumndmneunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
4Boston College21ndkstccorbmjyalnmuunhmicakfverfsumsumndmneunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
5North Dakota20stccorbmjyalnmuunhmicakfverfsumsumndmneunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
6St. Cloud State19corbmjyalnmuunhmicakfverfsumsumndmneunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
7Cornell18bmjyalnmuunhmicakfverfsumsumndmneunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
8Bemidji State17yalnmuunhmicakfverfsumsumndmneunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
9Yale16nmuunhmicakfverfsumsumndmneunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
10Northern Michigan15unhmicakfverfsumsumndmneunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
11New Hampshire11micverfsumneunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
12Michigan11akffsumsumndunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
13Alaska11unhvermsumneunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
14Vermont11micmsumndmneunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
15Ferris State10akfvermneunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
16Michigan State10unhfsumneunicc_unoumlbu_minrit
17Minnesota-Duluth9unhakffsumsuunicc_unominrit
18Maine8micmndcc_unoumlbu_minrit
19Union6mneunoumlbu_minrit
20Colorado College4uniunominrit
21Nebraska-Omaha4umlbu_minrit
22Mass.-Lowell4mndcc_bu_rit
23Boston University3mndcc_min
24Minnesota2umlrit
25RIT1bu_

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Modify Date Parameters

Season

End Date    Format: YYYYMMDD

Modify Game Results

Modify Pairwise Criteria

Post-2013 Method

As of 2013-14, 'Record vs. TUC' was removed, and a 'Quality Win Bonus' was added, along with home-road weightings

Use Post-2013 Method Use Old Method

Last n Games

Use a 'Last n Games' criterion, and, if so, how many...

No      Yes     

RPI Weights

Win Pct.
Opponents' Win Pct.
Opponents' Opponents Win Pct.

Pairwise Tiebreaker

RPI     Individual head-to-head comparison

Send Feedback | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

©2017 College Hockey News.