NCAA Tournament
Pairwise Comparison Ratings

Go to the Mobile Version of this page.

Note: This chart is updated as each game result comes in. This chart includes all new 2013-14 RPI effects, like home-road weighting and the 'Quality Win Bonus.'

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2010‑11 Season

Rk Team PCWs RPI Rk W-L-T Win % Rk
1 Yale 24 .5790 3 27-6-1 .8088
2 Boston College 23 .5821 2 30-7-1 .8026
3 North Dakota 22 .5873 1 30-8-3 .7683
4 Miami 21 .5620 4 23-9-6 .6842
5 Merrimack 19 .5520 8 25-9-4 .7105
6 Michigan 18 .5565 5 26-10-4 .7000
7 Denver 18 .5562 6 24-11-5 .6625
8 Union 17 .5526 7 26-9-4 .7179
9 Minnesota-Duluth 16 .5481 9 22-10-6 .6579
10 Nebraska-Omaha 15 .5330 12 21-15-2 .5789
11 Western Michigan 14 .5302 13 19-12-10 .5854
12 Notre Dame 13 .5429 11 23-13-5 .6220
13 New Hampshire 11 .5433 10 21-10-6 .6486
14 Dartmouth 11 .5285 14 19-12-3 .6029
15 Colorado College 10 .5264 16 22-18-3 .5465
16 Rensselaer 10 .5237 18 20-12-5 .6081
17 Boston University 8 .5276 15 19-12-8 .5897
18 Maine 8 .5247 17 17-12-7 .5694
19 Minnesota 7 .5178 20 16-14-6 .5278
20 Alaska-Anchorage 5 .5138 21 16-18-3 .4730
21 Wisconsin 3 .5205 19 21-16-4 .5610
22 Alaska 3 .5089 25 16-17-5 .4868
23 Air Force 2 .5120 22 20-11-6 .6216
24 St. Cloud State 1 .5113 23 15-18-5 .4605
25 Princeton 1 .5106 24 17-13-2 .5625
T U C   L i n e
Ferris State .5080 26 18-16-5 .526
Cornell .5078 27 16-15-3 .515
RIT .5061 28 19-11-8 .605
Bemidji State .5060 29 15-18-5 .461
Quinnipiac .5032 30 16-15-8 .513
Robert Morris .4992 31 18-12-5 .586
Minnesota State .4979 32 14-18-6 .447
Niagara .4972 33 18-13-4 .571
Northeastern .4970 34 14-16-8 .474
Lake Superior .4950 35 13-17-9 .449
Michigan State .4916 36 15-19-4 .447
Ohio State .4890 37 15-18-4 .459
Northern Michigan .4887 38 15-19-5 .449
Clarkson .4833 39 15-19-2 .444
Brown .4811 40 10-16-5 .403
Holy Cross .4784 41 17-16-5 .513
St. Lawrence .4747 42 13-22-5 .388
Harvard .4707 43 12-21-1 .368
Mercyhurst .4704 44 15-18-4 .459
Vermont .4650 45 8-20-8 .333
Connecticut .4646 46 15-18-4 .459
Canisius .4631 47 13-19-6 .421
Providence .4614 48 8-18-8 .353
Colgate .4536 49 11-28-3 .298
Bowling Green .4475 50 10-27-4 .293
Massachusetts .4430 51 6-23-6 .257
Bentley .4389 52 10-18-6 .382
Army .4387 53 11-20-4 .371
Michigan Tech .4268 54 4-30-4 .158
Mass.-Lowell .4258 55 5-25-4 .206
Sacred Heart .4113 56 6-25-6 .243
American Int'l .4096 57 8-24-1 .258
Alabama-Huntsville .4056 58 4-26-2 .156

* - RPI is adjusted because "bad wins" have been discarded. These are wins that cause a team's RPI to go down. (Explanation)

† - 'Quality Win Bonus'. For complete explanation of this and other factors, see our complete primer.

‡ - 'Weighted WL %' is the team's winning percentage after adjusting for home/road effects. See our complete primer.

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Note: CHN endorses KRACH as a replacement for the RPI.

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2010‑11 Season

RkTeamPWsComparisons Won
1Yale24bc_ndkmiamermicdenunimndunowmundmunhdarcc_renbu_mneminakawisakfafastcprn
2Boston College23ndkmiamermicdenunimndunowmundmunhdarcc_renbu_mneminakawisakfafastcprn
3North Dakota22miamermicdenunimndunowmundmunhdarcc_renbu_mneminakawisakfafastcprn
4Miami21mermicdenunimndunowmundmunhdarcc_renbu_mneminakawisakfafastcprn
5Merrimack19micdenmndunowmundmunhdarcc_renbu_mneminakawisakfafastcprn
6Michigan18denunimndwmundmunhdarcc_renbu_mneminakawisakfafastcprn
7Denver18unimndunowmundmunhdarcc_renbu_mneminakawisakfafastcprn
8Union17mermndunondmunhdarcc_renbu_mneminakawisakfafastcprn
9Minnesota-Duluth16unowmundmunhdarcc_renbu_mneminakawisakfafastcprn
10Nebraska-Omaha15micwmundmdarcc_renbu_mneminakawisakfafastcprn
11Western Michigan14uniunhdarcc_renbu_mneminakawisakfafastcprn
12Notre Dame13wmuunhdarcc_bu_mneminakawisakfafastcprn
13New Hampshire11unodarcc_bu_mneakawisakfafastcprn
14Dartmouth11cc_renbu_mneminakawisakfafastcprn
15Colorado College10renbu_mneminakawisakfafastcprn
16Rensselaer10ndmunhbu_minakawisakfafastcprn
17Boston University8mneminakawisakfafastcprn
18Maine8renminakawisakfafastcprn
19Minnesota7unhakawisakfafastcprn
20Alaska-Anchorage5wisakfafastcprn
21Wisconsin3afastcprn
22Alaska3wisafastc
23Air Force2stcprn
24St. Cloud State1prn
25Princeton1akf

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Modify Date Parameters

Season

End Date    Format: YYYYMMDD

Modify Game Results

Modify Pairwise Criteria

Post-2013 Method

As of 2013-14, 'Record vs. TUC' was removed, and a 'Quality Win Bonus' was added, along with home-road weightings

Use Post-2013 Method Use Old Method

Last n Games

Use a 'Last n Games' criterion, and, if so, how many...

No      Yes     

RPI Weights

Win Pct.
Opponents' Win Pct.
Opponents' Opponents Win Pct.

Pairwise Tiebreaker

RPI     Individual head-to-head comparison

Send Feedback | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

©2017 College Hockey News.