NCAA Tournament
Pairwise Comparison Ratings

Go to the Mobile Version of this page.

Note: This chart is updated as each game result comes in. This chart includes all new 2013-14 RPI effects, like home-road weighting and the 'Quality Win Bonus.'

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2012‑13 Season

Rk Team PCWs RPI Rk W-L-T Win % Rk
1 Quinnipiac 24 .5714 1 27-7-5 .7564
2 Minnesota 23 .5627 2 26-8-5 .7308
3 Mass.-Lowell 21 .5558 3 26-10-2 .7105
4 Boston College 20 .5406 6 22-11-4 .6486
5 Miami 19 .5470 5 24-11-5 .6625
6 North Dakota 18 .5368 8 21-12-7 .6125
7 New Hampshire 18 .5341 10 19-11-7 .6081
8 Notre Dame 15 .5497 4 25-12-3 .6625
9 Minnesota State 15 .5391 7 24-13-3 .6375
10 Denver 15 .5356 9 20-13-5 .5921
11 Niagara 14 .5339 11 23-9-5 .6892
12 Yale 14 .5316 14 18-12-3 .5909
13 Union 12 .5328 13 21-12-5 .6184
14 St. Cloud State 12 .5316 15 23-15-1 .6026
15 Western Michigan 12 .5302 16 19-11-8 .6053
16 Wisconsin 10 .5334 12 22-12-7 .6220
17 Boston University 9 .5215 17 21-16-2 .5641
18 Rensselaer 8 .5206 18 18-14-5 .5541
19 Providence 6 .5195 19 17-14-7 .5395
20 Brown 5 .5139 20 16-14-6 .5278
21 Dartmouth 4 .5096 22 15-14-5 .5147
22 Colorado College 3 .5122 21 18-19-5 .4881
23 Cornell 2 .5076 23 15-16-3 .4853
24 St. Lawrence 1 .5059 25 18-16-4 .5263
25 Ferris State 0 .5067 24 16-16-5 .5000
T U C   L i n e
Alaska .5059 26 17-16-4 .514
Robert Morris .5055 27 20-14-4 .579
Michigan .5041 28 18-19-3 .487
Ohio State .5037 29 16-17-7 .487
Nebraska-Omaha .5025 30 19-18-2 .513
Holy Cross .5018 31 20-14-3 .581
Connecticut .4992 32 19-14-4 .568
Air Force .4988 33 17-13-7 .554
Merrimack .4950 34 15-17-6 .474
Mercyhurst .4926 35 19-17-5 .524
Northern Michigan .4918 36 15-19-4 .447
Canisius .4906 37 19-18-5 .512
Bowling Green .4888 38 15-21-5 .427
Colgate .4871 39 14-18-4 .444
Lake Superior .4860 40 17-21-1 .449
Minnesota-Duluth .4831 41 14-19-5 .434
Penn State .4793 42 11-12-0 .478
Massachusetts .4791 43 12-19-3 .397
Maine .4786 44 11-19-8 .395
Princeton .4779 45 10-16-5 .403
Vermont .4779 46 11-19-6 .389
Michigan Tech .4773 47 13-20-4 .405
Michigan State .4759 48 14-25-3 .369
RIT .4755 49 15-18-5 .461
Clarkson .4704 50 9-20-7 .347
Harvard .4701 51 10-19-3 .359
American Int'l .4598 52 12-17-6 .429
Northeastern .4542 53 9-21-4 .324
Bentley .4488 54 12-20-3 .386
Bemidji State .4468 55 6-22-8 .278
Alaska-Anchorage .4360 56 4-25-7 .208
Army .4241 57 7-22-5 .279
Sacred Heart .3833 58 2-30-4 .111
Alabama-Huntsville .3774 59 1-20-1 .068

* - RPI is adjusted because "bad wins" have been discarded. These are wins that cause a team's RPI to go down. (Explanation)

† - 'Quality Win Bonus'. For complete explanation of this and other factors, see our complete primer.

‡ - 'Weighted WL %' is the team's winning percentage after adjusting for home/road effects. See our complete primer.

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Note: CHN endorses KRACH as a replacement for the RPI.

Customized Results

These Results are customized with the parameters you entered:

Custom Date and/or End Date -- 2012‑13 Season

RkTeamPWsComparisons Won
1Quinnipiac24minumlbc_miandkunhndmmnsdenniayalunistcwmuwisbu_renprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
2Minnesota23umlbc_miandkunhndmmnsdenniayalunistcwmuwisbu_renprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
3Mass.-Lowell21bc_miandkunhndmmnsdenniayaluniwmuwisbu_renprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
4Boston College20miandkunhmnsdenniayalunistcwmuwisbu_renprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
5Miami19ndkunhmnsdenniayalunistcwmuwisbu_renprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
6North Dakota18ndmmnsdenniayalunistcwmuwisbu_renprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
7New Hampshire18ndkmnsdenniayalunistcwmuwisbu_renprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
8Notre Dame15bc_miaunhniaunistcwmuwisprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
9Minnesota State15ndmdenniauniwmuwisbu_renprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
10Denver15ndmniayaluniwmuwisbu_renprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
11Niagara14yalunistcwmuwisbu_renprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
12Yale14ndmmnsstcwmuwisbu_renprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
13Union12yalstcwisbu_renprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
14St. Cloud State12umlmnsdenbu_renprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
15Western Michigan12unistcwisbu_renprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
16Wisconsin10stcbu_renprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
17Boston University9ndmrenprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
18Rensselaer8ndmprvbrndarcc_corstlfsu
19Providence6brndarcc_corstlfsu
20Brown5darcc_corstlfsu
21Dartmouth4cc_corstlfsu
22Colorado College3corstlfsu
23Cornell2stlfsu
24St. Lawrence1fsu
25Ferris State0

Note: This chart represents the system used by the NCAA to select and seed teams for the NCAA Tournament. A detailed explanation can be found in our Primer. For the purposes of NCAA eligibility (and therefore KRACH), a team's record is based only on games against other Division I hockey schools which are eligible for the NCAA Tournament.

Modify Date Parameters

Season

End Date    Format: YYYYMMDD

Modify Game Results

Modify Pairwise Criteria

Post-2013 Method

As of 2013-14, 'Record vs. TUC' was removed, and a 'Quality Win Bonus' was added, along with home-road weightings

Use Post-2013 Method Use Old Method

Last n Games

Use a 'Last n Games' criterion, and, if so, how many...

No      Yes     

RPI Weights

Win Pct.
Opponents' Win Pct.
Opponents' Opponents Win Pct.

Pairwise Tiebreaker

RPI     Individual head-to-head comparison

Send Feedback | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

©2017 College Hockey News.